I am an English major. I do all of the
expected English major things: I read at every opportunity, I have a journal
for all of my writing needs, and I subscribe to a poetry channel on YouTube.
Button Poetry, the YouTube channel I subscribe to, posts videos of slam poetry
performances wherein a poet recites their poem in dramatic fashion. Melissa
Lozada-Oliva, one of the poets that is featured on the Button Poetry channel,
won the National Poetry Slam Championship in 2015. Her winning poem, “Like
Totally Whatever”, was a direct response to another poem by poet Taylor Mali,
“Totally Like Whatever, You Know?” Both of the poems are a commentary on the
hesitant, questioning quality of the way some people talk. Mali makes the
argument that we all need to speak more assertively, and words such as “like”,
“you know”, and “totally” are detrimental to language. Lozada-Oliva, however,
views the same words that Mali took exception to as an inherently female
addition to language that is by no means harmful.
It is necessary to watch both of these
performances to fully understand my reaction to them so here are links to both videos:
The poems are very similar in
places, but the tone of each poem is dramatically different. Mali invites the
audience to laugh at what he views as the degradation of language, and he seems
largely ignorant of the broader and gendered message of his poem. Lozada-Oliva
takes what Mali implied—mostly women speak in this way—and emphasized it so
that the argument was inherently gendered. Mali asks “what has happened to our
conviction?” (1:34) in order to call attention to the fact that the
hesitant words “like” and “you know” make everyone sound as though they are
unsure. Lozada-Oliva argues that Mali was being sexist with this criticism
because women are typically thought of as the perpetrators of this tentative
way of speaking. Lozada-Oliva’s poem performance is powerful and emotional
right from the start. She begins her poem, “it has somehow
become necessary for old white men to tell me how to speak” (0:10), to remind her audience that this topic is only an issue because of patriarchal rules.
Just like Mali, Lozada-Oliva makes it a point to use “like” and “you know”
excessively, phrasing her sentences as though they were all questions, but she didn't mock this way of speaking like Mali did.
Lozada-Oliva does a fantastic job of
making her poem sarcastic, scathing, humorous, and thought-provoking. In the
face of Mali’s mansplaining, Lozada-Oliva says “maybe I am always speaking in
questions because I am so used to being cut off. It’s like, maybe this is a
defense mechanism” (1:36). Her idea that the uncertain way of speaking is a
defense mechanism makes a lot of sense and affected me on a personal level.
Women speak in questions because they are so used to being contradicted and talked
down to that a lot of their confidence in oration has been stolen from them. I can’t stop myself from inserting several “likes” and “you knows” in
my sentences because I am terrified that I will appear stupid if I say
something that I believe is true with confidence, and it turns out that what I
said was completely false. While Mali tells us that tentative speaking is a
problem that needs to be addressed, Lozada-Oliva reassures us that it doesn’t matter
how you use your voice, as long as you use it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAs a fellow journal-er (journal-ist? that's a real thing, and I like journal-er better), I feel we share a deep bond. This particular bond is strengthened by our shared love of Button Poetry! Vivienne, I feel like we find yet another shared interest every time we talk. One of my long-time favorite videos on Button Poetry is the piece called "Deceit & I" by RJ Walker ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgmRUJ3rofM ), it gets me every time. There is something about slam poetry that hits me in a visceral, emotional place, and I love it. It's like a semi-depressing adrenaline rush. Melissa Lozada-Oliva is talking about a poignant and serious topic in her piece, and because it is slam poetry, I believe it makes a bigger impact on the audience. Like I said, there is something so vulnerable about slam poetry, it is the perfect method in which to bring up sensitive or controversial ideas if you want to make a lasting impact. Also, humor coupled with slam poetry makes an even more compelling performance. As we know from being in this class, humor and uncomfortable conversations pair perfectly together like steak and wine!
ReplyDelete(I would assume, I don't like steak and I don't really drink wine)
P.S. The link I included contains some serious and dark content so watch at your own risk.
DeleteThis post is so interesting! And I love, love, love Lozada-Oliva's poem, which I hadn't encountered before. You know, as soon as I started watching the Mali performance, I was so put off by it. At the same time, I will push students to be more assertive and declarative in their *academic* writing, but even that is open for interrogation and discussion. (I also get so uncomfortable with people policing others' grammar and typos--and thinking I feel the same way. A paper or academic performance is one thing, but making people feel small for how they talk? or mistakes they make while talking. Gross.)
ReplyDelete